Skip to main content

The trouble with the blues

I‘ve been thinking more about cool and warm blues. 

Let’s take the colour wheel and put that pure blue at the bottom, just for practical reasons. This pure blue is the coolest of the cool, super cool. On the opposite side we habe orange, this should then be the warmest. On the top left and top right we have pure red and pure yellow. They are warm, I would say equally warm, judging from their distance from the orange. No one doubts that if you put even a little bit of blue into that pure red or that pure yellow you cool them down. If you put some yellow into the red or vice versa, you make them warmer. So you can always say if, for example, a red is warm relative to pure red or cool relative to pure red. This is easy. 

But for the blue it means that if you put a little red or a little yellow in it you make the blue warmer, because both red and yellow are warm colours. So relative to pure blue all other blues are warm blues. So you can only say if one blue is cooler or warmer than the other. None of them, exept for pure blue, is warm or cool. If, for example, you create a colour with 80% blue and 20% yellow on the one hand and a colour with 90% blue and 10% red on the other hand, the one with the yellow in it is warmer than the one with the red in it, because it contains more of a warm colour and less of the super cool blue. Everything that moves away from the super cool blue in either direction turns warmer. In my example, the blue with the yellow is farther away from cool blue than the blue with the red.

If what I have written above is as far away from nonsense as it can be (or at least far enough), from a physics point of view phtalo blue is actually warmer than ultramarine. Still, most people seem to perceive the opposite. Why? I think it could be because they perceive red as warmer than yellow and so a blue with added red is always perceived as warmer by them than one with added yellow. Also, it’s difficult to see if the proportion of red in one blue is higher than the proportion of yellow in that other blue. So it’s a fight between physics and subjective perception and the point is what of the two we consider more important in art, in painting.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sketch & Note

It's always great when you have finished a sketchbook and a new sketchbook is in front of you waiting to be started. It's especially exciting when the new one is a type you haven't used before. I've just started one of my new Sketch & Note sketchbooks - or rather sketch booklets - by Hahnemühle. They come in bundles of two with colourful covers and 40 pages each. The paper is rather smooth with a fine texture and weighs 125 gsm. The tools I prefer to work with are pencils, coloured pencils and ink. I do a preliminary drawing with pencil, then go over it with ink, adding also a bit of hatching where necessary, and then colour with coloured pencils. This paper seems to suit all these tools very well. It's smooth enough for good ink lines, but also has enough texture for the coloured pencils. I like to colour rather lightly, not minding some paper white showing through. Though, I'm sure if you want to get rid of it, that won't be a problem with this ...

Photorealism

Many people feel honoured when their drawing or painting is mistaken for a photo. Well, sometimes it happens unintentionally. But there are artists who strive for photorealism. They think it's the greatest achievement to be able to make a drawing or painting look like it is a photo, even to be able to literally copy a photo by drawing or painting it. I don't think so. Nowadays,  if your goal is to depict something as true to reality as possible, you can take a photo and that's it. Easy. So why would you learn to draw or paint, just to make your drawing (or painting) look like a photo? That doesn't make sense to me. I want my drawings to be something different, something more than photos are. The most important thing about drawing is the fun you have while doing it. But as far as the result is concerned, I want my drawings to have a character of their own, a different character than a photo has. At least, I want them to look like drawings. With this in mind, drawin...

Lack of inspiration

I haven't written here for a while. Nothing exciting has happened since the Craftsy course. Nothing to write about. I have done one or the other drawing since then, but nothing for the last two weeks, except some hatching exercises. It's the same old story. I want to draw, but don't know what. I still don't subscribe to the idea that everything is interesting when you draw it, so draw anything. I need a concept, a theme,  a subject with a meaning to me. I don't visit exciting places often or buy interesting new stuff. So what to draw when there is nothing like this to be inspired by? It's so frustrating to always have to search for a subject. I'm preparing next month's subject for the Virtual Sketchwalk group, a topic I am really interested in right now, so hopefully I will be occupied with it next month. But what until then and what after that? I need to solve this riddle, because I love to draw and I love to see another drawing emerge in my sketc...